UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous
Estimation of Levosulpiride and Esomeprazole
in Capsule Dosage Form
Jain Manu S.*, Agrawal Yogesh S., Chavhan Randhir B., Bari Manoj M., Barhate S. D.
Shree Sureshdada Jain Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and
Research, Jamner. Dist: Jalgaon.
(M.S.)– 424206.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mjain907@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Two simple, accurate, reproducible and
economical requiring no prior separation procedures for simultaneous estimation
of Levosulpiride and Esomeprazole
in capsule dosage form have been developed. First method employs formation and
solving of simultaneous equation using 234nm and 300nm as analytical
wavelengths for both drugs in methanol. The second method is Q value analysis
based on measurement of absorptivity at 241 nm (as an
isosbestic point) and 300nm. Levosulpiride
and Esomeprazole at their respective λmax 234nm and 300nm and at isosbestic
point 241nm shows linearity in the concentration range of 1-20 µg/mL. The proposed
methods are recommended for routine analysis since these are sensitive and
reliable.
KEYWORDS: Esomeprazole, Levosulpiride, λmax, Isosbestic point, Simultaneous equation, Q method.
INTRODUCTION:
Esomeprazole (ESO) is a proton pump inhibitor drug used
for short-term treatment of erosion and ulceration of the oesophagus
caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chemically
Esomeprazole is 6-methoxy-2-[(4-
methoxy-3,5-dimethylpyridin-2-yl) methylsulfinyl]-1H benzimidazole (Fig- 1). It is listed in Martindale-The
complete drug reference. Esomeprazole (ESO), S-isomer
of omeprazole inhibits gastric acid secretion and is
cost effective in the treatment of gastric oesophageal
reflux diseases. It is the first single optical isomer proton pump inhibitor.
It provides better acid control than current racemic
proton pump inhibitors and has a favourable
pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole.[1,3,7,8,10]
Levosulpiride, (Fig- 2) a purified levo‐isomer of sulpiride,
chemically it is 5‐ (aminosulfonyl) ‐N‐ [(1‐ethyl‐2‐pyrrolidinyl) methyl]‐2‐methoxy benzamide.
It is not official in any pharmacopoeia. It is listed in The Merck Index[1]
and Martindale, The Complete Drug Reference. Levosulpiride
is a D2‐dopamine receptor antagonist and commonly prescribed to
patients with psychosis, depression and functional dyspepsia.
At low doses, levosulpiride
increases dopaminergic neurotransmission, primarily
by the blocking of the dopamine autoreceptors, which
inhibits the pre‐synaptic dopamine synthesis and release of
dopamine[3]. Compared with racemic and dextro‐forms, the levo‐form of sulpiride has greater
central antidopaminergic activity, antiemetic and antidyspeptic effects and lower acute toxicity.[9]
Figure
1 : Esomeprazole (345.42)
Figure 2 : Levosulpiride
(341.43)
Literature survey showed that there is no report on the
simultaneous estimation of ESO and LSP in combined dosage form, we report
Spectrophotometric determination by simultaneous equation and Q Analysis
methods.
Figure 3:
Overlain spectra of LSP and ESO showing Isosbestic
point at 241 nm
Figure 4:
Spectrum of Esomeprazole
Figure 5: Spectrum of Levosulpiride
MATERIAL
AND METHOD:
Pure sample of Esomeprazole was obtained from Wockhardt
Ltd. Aurangabad and Levosulpiride from Wanbury Ltd. Mumbai as a gift sample. A UV/VIS
Spectrophotometer (Chemito Spectrascan
-2600) was used. Methanol AR (Merck Ltd. Mumbai) was procured from local
market. The marketed formulation of Sompraz - L (40 mg ESO and 75 mg LSP) was procured
from local market.
Selection of
common solvent:
Methanol of
analytical reagent grade was selected as common solvent for developing spectral
characteristics of drug. The selection was made after assessing the solubility
of both the drugs in different solvents.[5]
Preparation of
Standard Drug Solution:
Standard stock
solutions containing Levosulpiride (LSP) and Esomeprazole (ESO) were prepared individually by dissolving
100 mg of LSP and of ESO separately in 50 ml of methanol AR. It was then sonicated for 10 minutes and the final volume of the
solutions were made up to 100 ml with methanol to get stock solutions
containing 1000 µg/mL each of LSP and ESO in two
different volumetric flasks.[4,5,6]
Determination
of Absorption Maxima:
By appropriate
dilution of two standard drug solutions with methanol AR, solutions containing
10 µg/ ml of each LSP and ESO were scanned separately in the range of 200- 500
nm to determine the wavelength of maximum absorption for both the drugs. LSP
and ESO showed absorbance maxima at 234 nm (λ1) and 300 nm
(λ2) respectively. The overlain spectra showed λmax of both drugs and isosbestic
points at 241 nm. [4,5,6]
Method I
(Simultaneous equation method):
Two wavelengths
selected for the method are 234 nm and 300 nm that are absorption maximas of LSP and ESO respectively in methanol AR. The
stock solutions of both the drugs were further diluted separately with methanol
AR to get a series of standard solutions of 2-20 µg /mL
of LSP and 1-10 µg/mL of ESO concentrations. The
absorbance was measured at the selected wavelengths and absorptivities
(A 1%, 1 cm) for both the drugs at respective wavelengths were determined as
mean of three independent determinations. Concentrations in the sample were
obtained by using following equations-[2,6]
Where, A1 and
A2 = the absorbance’s of diluted solution at λ1 and
λ2
ay1 and ay2 = absorptivity
of Y at λ1 and λ2
ax1 and ax2 = absorptivity
of X at λ1 and λ2
Method II
(Absorbance ratio or Q-analysis method):
From the overlain
spectrum of LSP and ESO, two wavelengths were selected one at 241 nm, which is
the isosbestic point for both the drugs and the other
at 303 nm, which is λmax of ESO. The absorbances of the sample solutions prepared in a similar
manner as in the previous method were measured and the absorptivity
values for both drugs at the selected wavelengths were calculated. The method
employs Q values and the concentrations of drugs in sample solution were
determined by using the following formula:[2,6]
For ESO
For LSP
A = Absorbance of
sample at isosbestic point, a1 and a2
= Absorptivities of ESO and LSP respectively at Isosbestic point
Application of
the proposed method for the determination of ESO and LSP in Capsules:
Twenty Capsules
of the marketed formulation SOMPRAZ – L (SUN Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai)
containing LSP 75 mg and ESO 40 mg were weighed, and finely powdered. For
analysis of drug, quantity of powder equivalent to 18.75 mg of LSP and 10 mg of
ESO was weighed and dissolved in 5 ml of methanol and sonicated
for 10 minutes. Then the solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper no.
41 and the final volume of the solutions was made up to 10 ml with methanol to
get a stock solution containing 1000µg/ ml of ESO and 2000 µg/ ml LSP.
Appropriate aliquots of LSP and ESO within the Beer’s law limit were taken.
For Method I; the
concentration of both LSP and ESO were determined by measuring the absorbance
of the sample at 234 nm and 300 nm, values were substituted in the respective
formula to obtain concentrations.
For Method II;
the concentration of both LSP and ESO were determined by measuring absorbance
of the sample at 241 nm and 300 nm and values were substituted in the
respective formula to obtain concentrations. Results of capsule analysis are
shown in Table 3.
Table 1: Linear regression analysis of calibration curves.
|
Parameter |
Method I |
Method II |
||
|
LSP |
ESO |
LSP |
ESO |
|
|
Beer’s law limit (µg/ml.) |
2 – 20 |
1 – 10 |
2 – 20 |
1 – 10 |
|
Correlation coefficient (r) |
0.9938 |
0.9974 |
0.9938 |
0.9974 |
|
Sandell's
sensitivity (mcg/Sq.cm/0.001A) |
0.2 |
0.001 |
0.2 |
0.001 |
|
Slope |
0.038 |
0.042 |
0.038 |
0.042 |
|
Intercept |
-0.008 |
0.017 |
-0.008 |
0.017 |
Table 2: Results of analysis of plain drug.
|
Analyte |
Method I |
Method II |
||
|
LSP |
ESO |
LSP |
ESO |
|
|
% Conc. Estimated (Mean ± S.D.) |
99.2 ± 0.24 |
99.4 ± 0.20 |
99.3 ± 0.38 |
99.36 ± 0.34 |
|
Coefficient of variance |
0.24 |
0.20 |
0.38 |
0.34 |
Table 3: Results of analysis of capsule
samples.
|
Method |
Drug |
Label Claim
(mg) |
% Label Claim ±
SD |
Coefficient of
variance |
|
Method I |
LSP |
75 |
99.4 ± 0.173 |
0.17 |
|
ESO |
40 |
98.7 ± 0.37 |
0.37 |
|
|
Method II |
LSP |
75 |
99.4 ± 0.24 |
0.24 |
|
ESO |
40 |
100.2 ± 0.54 |
0.54 |
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Under described experimental conditions, the
calibration curve and assay of capsule was performed. Using appropriate
dilutions of standard stock solution, the two solutions were scanned
separately. A critical evaluation of proposed methods were performed by
statistical analysis of data where slope, intercept, correlation coefficient
were studied. Beer’s law is obeyed in the concentration range of 1 – 10 µg/ml
for ESO and 2 – 20 µg/ml of LSP and a correlation coefficient of 0.9974 and
0.9938 for both the drug ESO and LSP respectively. The proposed methods were
also evaluated for commercially available capsule containing ESO and LSP in
combination. The % assay from method I; was found to be 98.7 % for ESO and 99.4
% for LSP while from method II; 100.2 % for ESO and 99.4 % for LSP were found.
The accuracy and reproducibility is evident from the generated data as result
obtained are close to 100% and the standard deviation is low.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed method I and II provides
simple, accurate, fast and reproducible quantitative analysis for simultaneous
estimation if ESO and LSP in capsule. These methods can be successfully applied
for the simultaneous estimation of ESO and LSP in capsule dosage form without
prior separation and any interference in quality control.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are grateful to Mr. Suresh M. Dhariwal, Hon, Secretary, JTES, Jamner
for providing facilities to carry out this work in the research laboratory of
SSJIPER. The authors are thankful to the
Wockhardt Pharma.
Aurangabad and Wanbury Pharma.
Mumbai for providing gift samples of the drugs.
REFERENCES:
1.
“Indian
Pharmacopoeia” 2010, Indian Pharmacopoeial
Commission, Ghaziabad, 6th ed., Vol. II 1295 – 96.
2.
Beckett
AH., Stenlake JB, 2004, “Practical pharmaceutical
chemistry,” Fourth ed. Part – II, CBS Publishers and Distributers, New Delhi,
275 – 300.
3.
Sweetman SC, 2005, “Martindale – The complete drug reference”
Pharmaceutical press, 722, 1265.
4.
Rawat S., Gupta A,: Spectrophotometric
Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Nimesulide
and Diclofenac Sodium in Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms, Asian J. Pharm. Ana., 2011, 1 (4), 85-87.
5.
Vekaria HJ, Muralikrishna KS, Patel GF,: Development
and validation of Spectrophotometric method for estimation of fexofenadine hydrochloride and montelukast
sodium in combined dosage form. Inventi Impact: Pharma Ana and Qual Assur. 2011, (4), 197 – 199.
6.
Patil PR., Rakesh SU, Dhabale
PN, Burade KB.: Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric method for estimation of losartan potssium and amlodipine besylate in tablet
dosage form. Asian J. Research
Chem., 2009, 2(1), 183 – 187.
7.
Maheshwari DJ., Trivedi PD.: simultaneous estimation of esomeprazole and domperidone in combined dosage form by HPLC, Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 2011, 9(3), 187 –
194.
8.
Patil SS, Dhabale PN, Kuchekar BS, development and
statistical validation of spectrophotometric method for estimation of esomeprazole in tablet dosage form. Asian J. Research Chem., 2009, 2(2), 154 –
156.
9.
Manjunath S, Chauhan V, Sandeep S.: Spectrophotometric
estimation of levosulpiride in bulk drug and
formulations. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm.
Sci., 2011, 3(2), 135 – 137.
10.
Prabu SL., Shirwaikar A, Dinesh
Kumar C, Joseph A, Kumar R.: simultaneous
estimation of esomeprazole and domperidone
by UV spectrophotometric method., Indian J. Pharm.
Sci., 2008, 70(1), 128–131
Received on 14.07.2012 Accepted on 09.09.2012
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Ana. 2(4): Oct. - Dec. 2012; Page 106-109